Legal Opinion

Moorman & Singleton v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 21, 1962No. 4037-4040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeals in these plea of privilege cases were dismissed because appellants filed no briefs within the time prescribed by Rule 414, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. On motion for rehearing appellants insist no briefs are necessary in appeals from interlocutory orders, and that Rule 414 has no application thereto. They cite cases holding no briefs are necessary in appeals from orders on temporary injunction.

The basis of these holdings is that Rule 385(d) provides that where the appeal is from an order granting or refusing a temporary injunction, the “cause may be heard in the Court of Civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kirby Lumber Corporation v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Fitch v. International Harvester Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Schkade v. Independent-Eastern Torpedo Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Bloss v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. DobieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Rodriguez v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Moorman v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Mitchell v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Davis v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API