Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Farmers' State Bank of Greentop

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1916No. 6174PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; Jamies B. Cullison, Judge. Action by the Farmers’ State Bank of Greentop, Mo., against T. T. Ratliff and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

On March 3, 1910, defendants purchased from W. C. Mikel & Co., of Green-top, Mo., one Perdieron stallion, numbered, registered, and pedigreed as such, and executed in payment therefor their two certain promissory notes. This suit was instituted to recover upon one of said notes, which note was transferred to the Farmers’ State Bank of Greentop, Mo., and is a non-negotiable instrument.

It is alleged in the answer that W. C. Mikel & Co. represented that said animal was a Percheron stallion, numbered, registered, and pedigreed as such, and that said representations,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beasley, Hallett & Co. v. Huyett & Smith Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. McCorkell v. KarhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Hubby v. StokesTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Huckabee v. AlbrittonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  5. Dowagiac Manuf'g Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. National Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API