Legal Opinion

Fishel v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1954No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

An appeal in this case to the Superior Court (Fishel v. McDonald, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 251, 60 A. 2d 820) resulted in a reversal so that the plaintiff might amend. The facts are succinctly stated by Judge Reno in the opinion in that case, at page 252 as follows: “In 1928 David A. Hammond conveyed property to plaintiffs [the Fishels], husband and wife, subject to a mortgage given by Hammond to the Keystone-Westmoreland Building and Loan Association, and plaintiffs gave their mortgage to Hammond for part of the purchase price. Later in 1928 plaintiffs conveyed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. A. R. Boyd Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Kennedy v. BorieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Fishel Et Ux. v. McDonald Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leister v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API