Legal Opinion

Bowen v. A. R. Boyd Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1937No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The plaintiff in this proceeding in equity seeks to have a third mortgage owned by her reinstated as a lien upon the mortgaged premises after it had been discharged by a foreclosure sale upon a prior incumbrance. Her prayer for relief is based upon the allegation that the foreclosure in question had for its primary purpose the discharge of her third mortgage, and was a fraudulent and collusive arrangement between the first mortgagee and the owner of the property.

It appears from the record that on March 9, 1930, the plaintiff and her husband, James K. Bowen, sold…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pusey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Rauch v. DechSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Clark v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  5. Calder v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grenet's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Shedden, L., Aplts. v. Anadarko E&P Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Baily PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Greene v. SpitzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Fishel Et Ux. v. McDonald Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API