Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2012No. 11AB0297; A147962Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

Respondent Employment Department petitions for reconsideration of our decision in Holbrook v. Employment Dept., 248 Or App 754, 273 P3d 375 (2012), in which we reversed and remanded the order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) for reconsideration, citing Opp v. Employment Dept., 242 Or App 673, 259 P3d 15 (2011). In Opp, we had held that, where EAB affirms the order of an administrative law judge without opinion, EAB’s order is “insufficient to meet the standards of ORS 183.470(2)” and we must remand the case to EAB to make findings and explain how those findings support its conclusion.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opp v. Employment Department & Youssef, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Erne v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Levu v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API