Legal Opinion

HAYMES v. GARMAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01022Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ LAMAR HAYMES, : Petitioner, : : v. : Civil No. 2:21-cv-1022-JMG : MICHAEL GOURLEY, et al., : Respondents. : __________________________________________ ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2024, after considering (1) the pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

filed by Petitioner Lamar Haymes (“Haymes”) (ECF No. 1), (2) Haymes’ separately filed exhibits in support of his Petition (ECF No. 4), (3) the state court record, (4) Haymes’ Memorandum of Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Cynthia A. Ebbert v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Kabacinski v. Bostrom Seating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API