Legal Opinion
Mary Tagliaferri v. Palomar Specialty Insurance Company, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 1, 2025No. 4:25-cv-02148Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARY TAGLIAFERRI, Case No. 25-cv-02148-KAW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS; GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE 10 PALOMAR SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 27, 28 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Mary Tagliaferri brings the instant action against Defendants Palomar Specialty 14 Insurance Co. (“Palomar”) and Sedgwick Claims Management Services (“Sedgwick”), alleging 15 that Defendants failed to pay the total amount due under an insurance policy. (First Amend. 16 Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 15, Dkt. No.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.