Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul D. Ylda

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1981No. 79-5674PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

On petition for rehearing, Ylda reasserts his contention that the trial judge’s jury instruction impermissibly broadened the elements of the offense charged in the indictment, thus constituting reversible error. Having again fully reviewed the evidence, we find no possibility that it permitted the jury to convict Ylda based on the extraneous elements of the offense interjected by the trial court’s charge. Therefore, the jury instruction, though improper, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and did not constitute reversible error.

In Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 80 S.Ct. 270, 4…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. United States v. Leonard L. Bursten, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Enrique M. Salinas, Dan Sanchez, Jr. And Lewis WoodulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Ronald Glen ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API