Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1977No. 7626IC755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the findings of fact and conclusions of law that plaintiff is entitled to compensation for further temporary total disability since 19 July 1974 because he then suffered a change of condition for the worse and has not reached the end of the healing period or maximum improvement. Specifically, defendant contends that the findings (1) that plaintiff had a change of condition for the worse and again became temporarily totally disabled on 19 July 1974, (2) that he has remained temporarily disabled since that date, (3) that at the time of the hearing [1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Cates v. Hunt Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Carpenter v. Industrial Piping Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API