Touse v. Consolidated Ry. & Power Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; S. W. Stewart, Judge. Action by Mohr Touse against the Consolidation Eailway & Power Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Dissent
STRAUP, J.,
(dissenting.)
1. I cannot concur in the opinion of the majority court. This was an appeal from the judgment. The assigned errors all relate to the admission or exclusion of testimony, on charging the jury, and refusing to charge as appellant .requested. Proper exceptions were had and all properly reserved by a bill of exceptions. It seems clear to me such matters are properly before us for review without first requiring a motion for a new trial to have been made before the trial court. They are “rulings” or “decisions in the action or proceeding to which exceptions have been taken…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Treadwell v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Emerson v. Eldorado Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896
- Hammond v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.