Walden v. Automobile Owners Safety Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.
This case involves the construction of a policy of accident insurance. The cause was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts detailing the testimony certain persons would'give if called as witnesses. The stipulation provides: ‘ ‘ Since there is no significant dispute as to the facts involved herein, the above case is being-submitted on the testimony stipulated below for. the decision . . . as to the applicable law.” Mrs. Dan E. Walden, the beneficiary' named in the policy, has appealed from a judgment in favor of the insurance company.
The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dorsey v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Eynon v. Continental Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Southern Surety Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Esther W. McDaniel v. Standard Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Finley v. Prudential Life & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Beatrice Rauch, a Widow v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. HardeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Aluminum Company of America v. WaldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Continental Casualty Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.