White v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The appellee-railway company commenced this action in the district court to recover freight under-charges, under § 6(7), Part I, Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 6(7),1 on various shipments made by the appellant-freight forwarder from California over the appellee’s line and its connecting carriers to destinations in various other states. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, the defendant-appellant?s motion for a new trial was denied, and the latter appeals. The appeal is submitted to us upon ani agreed statement of fact.
Since interstate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bernstein Bros. Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Denver & R.G.W.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Federal Commerce & Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
- National Carloading Corp. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982