Legal Opinion

White v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1945No. 10791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The appellee-railway company commenced this action in the district court to recover freight under-charges, under § 6(7), Part I, Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 6(7),1 on various shipments made by the appellant-freight forwarder from California over the appellee’s line and its connecting carriers to destinations in various other states. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, the defendant-appellant?s motion for a new trial was denied, and the latter appeals. The appeal is submitted to us upon ani agreed statement of fact.

Since interstate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernstein Bros. Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Denver & R.G.W.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Federal Commerce & Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
  4. National Carloading Corp. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API