Legal Opinion

National Carloading Corp. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1945No. 10756PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company brought action in the district court against National Carloading Corporation to recover, under § 6(7), Part I, Interstate Commerce Act, 1 freight undercharges on shipments made by the latter, as freight forwarder, from California to various eastern points. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the freight forwarder appeals.

Appellant-freight forwarder, as shipper, engaged the transportation facilities of the appellee-carrier and its connecting lines for the shipping of household goods. An understanding existed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McFadden v. Alabama Great Southern R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. Fox & London, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. White v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. T. & M. Transp. Co. v. S. W. Shattuck Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Va. v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. National Milling Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  4. Transmix Corp. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Porto Transport, Inc. v. Consolidated Diesel Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API