Legal Opinion

Merrimac Mining Co. v. Gross

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1943No. 33,551PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henry M. Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff sued to recover contribution from its co-lessees for rent and taxes which it claims to have paid under the terms of a mining lease. The trial court found for defendants except as to a rent item of $300, to which reference will hereinafter be made. The appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The lease here involved was entered into on October 13, 1909, between Hans Andersen and wife, as lessors, and Albert F. Gross, Roscoe C. Jamison, and Dan C. Peacock, as lessees. It was to run for a term of 60 years and provided for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Milwaukee General Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API