Legal Opinion

State v. Ervin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1994No. 64252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patton, Presiding Judge.

The state of Ohio (the “state”) appeals from the trial court’s sentencing order placing defendant-appellee on probation after the jury returned a guilty verdict for one count of aggravated robbery (R.C. 2911.01) and a not guilty verdict on the accompanying firearm specification. The state contends that the appellee is ineligible for probation pursuant to R.C. 2951.02(F)(3) despite the jury’s not guilty verdict on the firearm specification. We agree with the state’s assertion.

The following assignment of error is presented for our review:

“The trial court erred by placing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KossOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Harry, Ca2008-01-013 (12-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. NowlinOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API