Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beatty v. Haggard

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 2004No. CA 03-879Published

1DissentWendell L. Griffen, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the decision reached by the majority and would affirm the trial court’s decision. I agree with the majority that the burden of proof is the clear and convincing standard articulated in Riley v. Hoisington, 80 Ark. App. 346, 96 S.W.3d 743 (2003). However, I think the decision is affirmable under that authority.

Once we determine that the appropriate burden of proof was placed on the appellant at the trial court level, we review the trial court’s decision under the clearly erroneous standard of review. Burdette v. Madison, 209 Ark. 314, 719 S.W.2d 418 (1986). We do…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley v. HoisingtonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Burdette v. MadisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API