Legal Opinion

Riley v. Hoisington

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 29, 2003No. CA 02-374PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Josephine Linker Hart, Judge.

Paul Riley appeals the trial court’s order to rescind a written contract for the sale of real estate. For reversal, appellant argues that: (1) the trial court failed to state the appropriate standard of proof and should have stated whether it specifically found that appellees had proven the elements of fraudulent misrepresentation by clear and convincing evidence; (2) the appellees did not prove all the elements of their claim for fraud; (3) the property had been altered by appellees in such a manner that upon rescission the parties could not be restored to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Lane v. RachelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Cardiac Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, P.A. Profit Sharing Trust v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beatty v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Barringer v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Technology Partners, Inc. v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Hudson v. HiloCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Burgess v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API