Legal Opinion

Ward v. Feltman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1948Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for restitution and to recover for unlawful use and occupation of real property, order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment of dismissal thereon entered, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. In our opinion plaintiffs, suing by their first cause of action for restitution upon the ground of unjust enrichment of defendants during the continuance of injunctions and stays issued by the court, do not sue for damages resulting from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Pitcher v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Bedell Co. v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. City of New York v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API