United States v. Asarco, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
' The United States filed its complaint in this consolidated action on August 6, 1986, seeking to recover its response costs incurred and to be incurred in responding to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances at the California Gulch Superfund Site under section 107 of CERCLA, 1 42 U.S.C. § 9607, and to obtain injunctive relief to abate the release or threatened release of hazardous substances under section 106 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606. The United States asserted claims against twelve defendants, including ASARCO, Inc.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- County Line Investment Company And, Wagco Land Development, Inc. v. Calvin L. TinneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Centerior Service Company General Electric Company Ashland Oil, Incorporated v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKesson Corporation v. Gary W. Flanders Great Northern Transportation Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Town of Munster, Indiana v. Sherwin-Williams Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.