Legal Opinion
Osborne v. Buck's Moving & Storage, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1989No. 88-991PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
On rehearing, the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court dismissed the petition of Sillis Jim Osborne because Osborne failed to prove that his “injuries . . . were the result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment.” Osborne appeals, claiming that the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court is incorrect.
“Findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court after rehearing have the same force and effect as a jury verdict in a civil case. [Citations omitted.] In testing the sufficiency of evidence to support findings of fact made by the Nebraska…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Fees v. Rivett Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- McLaughlin v. McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Osborne v. Buck's Moving & StorageNebraska Supreme Court · 1989