Legal Opinion
United States v. James Daddato
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 17, 1993No. 92-3750PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a question on which there are no reported cases: whether a judge may impose a condition in the nature of restitution on a sentence of supervised release, even if the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982,18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-64, would not authorize the type of restitution ordered for the defendant’s crime.
Pursuant to his plea of guilty, James Daddato was convicted of the federal crime of selling hallucinogenic mushrooms and sentenced to 16 months in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release. His appeal challenges one of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Jack Gilpin v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Pedro L. Castillo and Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GibbensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Stanley CottmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. John A. CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Philip J. MenzaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.