Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. Straus
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1995No. 92 Civ. 2754(WCC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia S. Mikes brings this action on behalf of the United States and herself against her former employers under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (the “FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730, for alleged improper billing of medical procedures to the United States and for retaliatory discharge, and under New York Labor Law § 191 for unpaid wages for a two-week period of employment after her formal termination. In a prior opinion we denied defendants’ motion to dismiss, converted by the Court sua sponte into a motion for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Valdes v. Swift Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Cowan v. Ernest Codelia, PCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Paduano v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Nguyen v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.