Legal Opinion
Berryhill v. Evans
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 25, 2006No. Nos. 04-6392, 05-6038PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
These appeals arise from Mr. Berryhill’s fourth federal habeas petition seeking relief from his state court larceny convictions.1 In the ten years since the district court entered its final habeas judgment in this ease, the case has come before us six times. We previously found it necessary to sanction Mr. Berryhill for filing successive applications to file second or successive petitions, a step that did not forestall his current filing. Case No. 04-6392 is Mr. Berryhill’s appeal from the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, brought in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas case. Case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Edwin L. Moore v. Captain Schoeman Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Anthony Jerome Harris v. Ron Champion, Warden Susan Brimmer Loving , Attorney General for the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Douglas v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Clark v. MilyardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Cleveland v. HavanekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Cleveland v. HavanekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.