Robert Olaf Anderson v. The State of Wyoming

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] A jury convicted the appellant of felony driving while under the influence of alcohol. He now challenges two rulings of the district court-one concerning discovery and one concerning the admissibility of evi dence-and also alleges his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding no error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] 1. Did the district court abuse its discretion by denying in part the appellant's pretrial Request for IntoxNet Database Pursuant to W.S. § 31-6-105(e) and Proof of Compliance with Statutory Predicate for Admission of a Chemical Test Result Under W.S. 31-6-105(a) ?

2. Did…