Micklevitz v. Chapman
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JORDAN MICKLEVITZ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-CV-905 TEHRANGI CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Jordan Micklevitz, who is representing himself, filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants violated the Fourth Amendment when they used OC spray to gain his compliance, arrested him, and searched his apartment after arresting him. Defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, I will grant the motion and dismiss this case.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.