Legal Opinion

Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.:

Richard A. Marlette, Sr. (“Mr. Mar-lette”) and his wife, Marleen Marlette (“Mrs. Marlette”), (collectively, “the Mar-lettes”) appeal from the Order1 directing State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) to pay the Mar-lettes delay damages in the amount of $28,223.76 in the underlying uninsured motorist (“UM”) case. In its cross-appeal,2 State Farm challenges its obligation to pay delay damages in excess of its policy limits. After careful review, we vacate the judgment and remand for a recalculation of delay damages.

The instant case arises from an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Baranowske v. J.D. Wood & Sons, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2013
  3. Fisher, J. v. Kaczorowski, E., M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API