Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1966No. 16662PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Appellees Milton Akers and wife Helen Akers filed suit against appellant John T. Mitchell for damages arising out of the drowning of their son, Philip Akers, aged three years and eight months, in appellant’s private swimming pool located on appellant’s property. Appellees’ action was brought as parents in their own behalf pursuant to Art. 4671, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. Statutes, and also as sole heirs in behalf of the child’s estate pursuant to Art. 5525, V.A.C.S.

The two actions are quite different. Under the common law no recovery of damages was permitted for the death of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Pope v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Landers v. BF Goodrich CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wymore v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Eaton v. R. B. George Investment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. John Russell Webster, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Houston, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Landreth v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Castleberry v. Goolsby Building Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Murphy v. Martin Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API