Legal Opinion
Pirog v. Ingber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Miller, J.), dated February 7, 1992, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied their cross motion to amend the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court acted properly in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying the appellants’ cross motion. The appellants’ legal malpractice claim is barred by the defendants’ successful prosecution of a prior action to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Sommer & SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- John Grace & Co. v. Tunstead, Schechter & TorreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ingber v. PirogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re the Estate of SacklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Harris v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- York v. LandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Lefkowitz v. SchulteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.