Legal Opinion

Cintas Corporation v. Jupiter Aluminum Corporation

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 10, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00160Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION CINTAS CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, ) ) vs. ) 2:20CV160-PPS/JPK ) JUPITER ALUMINUM CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant and Counterclaimant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Between 2008 and 2019, Cintas Corporation provided rental uniforms to Jupiter Aluminum Corporation, both for Jupiter’s Hammond facility and other locations. The relationship has ended badly with each side hurling accusations back and forth resulting in a complaint by Cintas, a counterclaim by Jupiter, and a counterclaim-to-the- counterclaim by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cromeens, Holloman, Sibert, Inc. v. AB VolvoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Halim v. Great Gatsby's Auction Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In re Fluidmaster, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. CoMentis, Inc. v. Purdue Research FoundationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API