Legal Opinion

McCoy v. City of Knoxville

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 23, 1963No. Gen. 11,730PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

The plaintiffs, John C. McCoy, Jr., and Nelda C. McCoy, filed suit for a declaratory judgment on an agreed statement of facts, seeking a determination that certain property under the zoning ordinance of the defendant, City of Knoxville, can he used for filling station purposes as a lawful pre-existing nonconforming use. The Trial Court held that there was a non-use or cessation of use for filling station purposes for more than two years, and that this constituted a discontinuance of the pre-existing nonconforming use, thus placing the property and proposed use in the “A” Residence District…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Village of Melrose ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pioneer Insulation & Modernizing Corp. v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Mercer Lumber Co. v. Village of GlencoeIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Dobbs v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Franmor Realty Corp. v. Le BoeufNew York Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Canada's Tavern, Inc. v. Town of Glen EchoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Sanderson v. De Kalb County Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Dandy Co. v. Civil City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Welch v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API