Legal Opinion

Smith v. El Paso N.E. R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1933No. 2871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Rehearing., Appellant and appellees each file a motion for rehearing. We will first, consider appel-lees’ motion.

Error is assigned to the opinion holding that appellees were entitled only to six peremptory challenges. Appellees neither discuss nor refer to any authority to sustain their contention. The authorities referred to in the opinion, we think, sustain the view there expressed. The statute (Rev. St. 1925, art. 2148), in civil cases, expressly allows six peremptory challenges to “each party.” Party does not mean person. Several defendants having identical interests in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hines v. ArrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. North v. Atlas Brick Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Waldo v. Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Gallaher v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Mesa Trucking Company v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Wagstaff v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API