Legal Opinion

State Division of Human Rights v. Luppino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 1970PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartuscello, J.

The question which is common to both of these proceedings is whether the State Division of Human Rights has the authority to order payment of damages for mental anguish and pain and suffering where the Division has made a determination of an unlawful discriminatory practice in housing. The Speer case also raises the question of whether the State Division has the authority in such a case to order payment of attorney’s fees of a complainant.

In Luppino, the administrative proceeding was commenced on a complaint by one Azel L.. Nolen charging that the respondents had discriminated against him in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Aaron v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Ferraiolo v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Weynberg v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. DilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Cullen v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API