Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lupatsky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1985No. 501PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence imposed pursuant to appellant’s plea of guilty to three counts of delivering marijuana. Appellant claims that his sentence, *340three concurrent terms of one and one half to five years imprisonment, was excessive and an abuse of judicial discretion. Specifically, it is alleged that the court erred in considering as an aggravating factor prior summary convictions, which, properly, were not factored into the prior record score, in order to escalate appellant’s sentence into the aggravated minimum range provided by the Sentencing Guidelines,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DudenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. HollerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. GaskinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. BedleyoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DardenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API