Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tilghman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 1987No. 00770PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence imposed after appellee entered a negotiated plea to burglary. Appellant, the Commonwealth, contends that (1) the court below erred in refusing to include appellee’s juvenile adjudications in computing his prior record score; and (2) assuming that appellee’s prior record score was correctly computed, the totality of the circumstances indicates that the sentencing court imposed an unreasonably lenient sentence. Finding appellant’s first contention to be without merit and the second to have been waived, we affirm the judgment of sentence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., Zinc Smelting DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Green v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Community College v. FoxCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. DuffySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. LoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. EysterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API