Legal Opinion

Kinard v. Carrier

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1965No. 1437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This is a suit to enjoin an alleged violation of zoning regulations, the commercial úse of property in an area zoned residential. The defendant landowner appeals from adverse judgment permanently enjoining the use of his premises for commercial purposes.

The trial court sustained the plaintiff’s contention that the defendant had lost whatever right he had to a nonconforming use of the property by a discontinuance of such use for more than thirty months. Because we find that (as a matter of law) there was no discontinuance of the nonconforming use, it is unnecessary to discuss…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Village of Melrose ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. National Lumber Products Co. v. PonzioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Dobbs v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. McCoy v. City of KnoxvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. CusimanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Kinard v. CarrierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API