Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Eugene v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. 91-50062, 91-50073; CA A75143, A75145Published

1DissentEdmonds, J.

The majority holds that the City of Eugene Ordinance section 4.860(d) which prohibits the sale of merchandise on a city street or sidewalk is unconstitutionally over-broad and violates Article I, section8. It is inconceivable to me that a city cannot lawfully prohibit vendors from setting up places to sell merchandise in the middle of a street or sidewalk or regulate such activities in the light of the city’s authority to prevent potential harm to the public. The majority’s conclusion strips bare the city’s ability to control commercial activity in its streets and on its sidewalks.

Eugene Code…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Greer v. SpockSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API