Todd v. Howell
Indiana Court of Appeals
Suit by John "W. Howell and another against Ezra N. Todd. Prom a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. On motion to retax costs. (See 47 Ind. App. 665.)
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.
Appellees have filed a motion to retax the costs of this appeal, and to have charged against appellant the reporter’s fee for the transcript of the evidence.
It is asserted in support of the motion that the special finding of facts and conclusions of law present the question relating to the mechanic’s lien on which the judgment was reversed; that appellees have entered a remittitur of $50, as required by the mandate of this court, thereby making the conditional affirmance of the personal judgment against appellant final and conclusive.
1. The question presented is whether the transcript of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. State, ex rel. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Sharp v. MaliaIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Line v. State ex rel. LouderIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Monroe v. City of Fort HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kruger v. DuckwallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pittman-Rice Coal Co. v. HansenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Blackford County Bank v. Eaton State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922