Rivera de Rivera v. Banco Crédito y Ahorro Ponceño
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Dávila
delivered the opinion of the Court.
As a result of defendant bank having honored certain postdated checks, plaintiff’s current account had insufficient funds to cover the amount of other antedated checks presented for collection and which were not therefore honored. Plaintiff alleges that this injured his credit. Together with his wife he brought an action for damages. The trial court awarded him $10,000 plus $600 for attorney’s fees. We decided to review this judgment.
Section 13 of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Act — 19 L.P.R.A. § 13 (1961 ed.) — expressly recognizes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. BattatNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. ScrimgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- People ex rel. Dikeman v. President & Trustees of BrooklynCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1834
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.