Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Matesanz

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 22, 2003No. 01-2166PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

This petition for habeas corpus seeks relief from the denial of petitioner’s motion for a new trial in the state court. In pursuing a new trial, petitioner argued that (1) the trial court’s denial of defense counsel’s motion for a continuance at the beginning of the trial was “so arbitrary as to violate due process,” and (2) defense counsel’s subsequent conduct at trial violated the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel. In asserting those arguments here, petitioner contends that the state courts’ denial of his motion for a new trial was contrary to, and an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cortés-Rivera v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. 1988 Trust For Allen Children v. Banner Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. Locke v. CattellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. Lucien v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. Rosado v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API