Downie v. Buennagel
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Superior Court of Marion County.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.
By a proper assignment of error here the appellant, the plaintiff below, has brought before this court the same errors assigned by h.im in general term, in this cause, which were in substance as follows:
1. The overruling of his demurrer to the second paragraph of appellee’s answer;
2. Error of the court in its conclusion of law upon its special finding of facts; and,
3. The overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The facts found by the court at special term, in its special finding, are substantially the same as those alleged by the appellee in the second paragraph of his answer, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. MiddlesworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- South v. SouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Lofton v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Hinds v. HindsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Tyner v. ReeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Ridgeway v. LanphearIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- VanGorder v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Grise, Admr. v. Weiss, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Bowser v. MattlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.