Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas L. Hudspeth
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 10, 1994No. 93-1352PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
As footnote * * * in the majority opinion dealing with the merits of this case, issued today, discloses, Judge Cudahy, who was an active judge when the case was heard en banc but had not been a member of the three-judge panel that had heard the case originally, and who took senior status (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 371(b)) after the en banc hearing, believes that the statute governing the composition of en banc courts in federal courts of appeals precludes his participation in the decision of the case. Because the view of another circuit is contrary and the issue may recur,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. American-Foreign Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- The United States of America v. Joe Alvin AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Cross-Appellees v. Lady Baltimore Foods, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gregory R. Czerkies v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration and Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Igartúa De La Rosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Gregory R. Czerkies v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration and Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Igartua-De-La-Rosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Igartúa De La Rosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.