Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Town of Oconto Falls

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is an action for damages for injuries received from a fall which the plaintiff suffered when the horse which he was driving ran away with him. The horse shied at a piece of galvanized culvert pipe, twenty inches in diameter and twenty-two feet long, which had been placed beside the road by the chairman of the defendant town of Oconto Falls. Due to the fright thus caused, the horse suddenly wheeled about and ran away, and in so doing caused the plaintiff to be hurled from the carriage, causing the injuries complained of.

The culvert pipe in question had been rolled off a wagon at the side…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apfelbacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bloor v. Town of DelafieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Barrett v. Village of HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Evans v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Loberg v. Town of AmherstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Milwaukee Terminal Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Poneitowcki v. HarresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Erickson v. Village of West SalemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Robb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Crowley v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API