Legal Opinion

MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division except insofar as it discusses a right to a hearing because of injury to petitioner’s reputation. Inasmuch as that issue was not raised in the petition, it need not be reached here (cf. Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860).

In addition, we note that the respondents’ determination to disqualify petitioner was neither without factual basis nor was it arbitrary or capricious.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anonymous v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shurgin v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Lichtman v. GrossbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Attard v. KampeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Castner v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. MATTER OF MINGO v. PirnieNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API