Legal Opinion
Anonymous v. Codd
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 1976PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. On this appeal, petitioner seeks an annulment of respondent police commissioner’s determination to terminate his services as a probationary police officer without a hearing. As a probationary employee, petitioner is not entitled to an administrative hearing concerning the reasons for his dismissal absent proof, not present in this record, that the dismissal was for an improper reason or in bad faith (Matter of Bergstein v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 318; Haberman v Codd, 48 AD2d 505; Matter of Reeves v Golar, 45 AD2d 163; *861Matter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Talamo v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- MATTER OF BERGSTEIN v. Bd. of Educ.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Haberman v. CoddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Reeves v. GolarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Ramos v. Department of Mental HygieneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- MATTER OF SWINTON v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- York v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- MATTER OF BERGAMINI v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Beacham v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Anonymous v. Commissioner of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.