Hernandez v. Ethyl Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this suit in which they- are seeking to recover overtime compensation under the. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., and the Portal to Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S. C.A. § 251 et seq., for a thirty minute lunch period which they contend was not free and uninterrupted. The suit as originally filed was one for a thirty minute change of clothes time, but by agreement and stipulation the issue presented the lower court and this court is whether thg lunch period of the plaintiffs was com-pensable under the law applicable. Stated another…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. CulkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Borne v. BourgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- In Re Succession of Abraham.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hargett v. Chemical Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Guillermo Deyá v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
- Belgard v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.