Legal Opinion

Atlantic Steel Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1929No. 19295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bkoyi.es, O. J.

This was a suit upon the terms of a “use and occupancy” clause of a policy of insurance. By consent the case was submitted to the trial judge, without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the defendant insurance company. It was shown in the agreed statement of facts that an explosion had occurred in one of the several mills of the Atlantic Steel Company, which resulted in the closing of that particular mill for fifteen working days, and that the shutting down of the mill was covered by the “use and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herder v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Reserve Life Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  3. Rothenberg v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Alwood v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API