Legal Opinion

Rothenberg v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1967No. 42533PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

We affirm. Extensive annotations on business interruption insurance are to be found in 83 ALR2d 885-922, and concerning insurance on profits expected to be realized on particular goods or merchandise, in 83 ALR2d 889. But we need go no further than the provisions of this policy in making our determination. They are clear and unambiguous.

It is provided that: “1. For the purposes of this insurance, the term ‘perils insured against’ shall mean the perils, as defined and limited in the direct property damage form to which this endorsement is attached, applicable to Coverage B,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Steel Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beautytuft, Inc., Jorges Carpet Mills, Inc., and Moccasin Bend Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Factory Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. Buxbaum v. Aetna Life and Casualty CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Ramada Inn Ramogreen, Inc., D/B/A 1800 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Keetch v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Home Indemnity Co. v. Hyplains Beef, L.C.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API