Union Transfer & Storage Co. v. Lefeber
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge Walker
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion holding the Commission erred in granting petitioner’s application. The appel*289lants-intervenors are existing carriers seeking to prevent the petitioner from obtaining common carrier authority to transport Group 18-A household goods throughout the State.
The majority cites to the three requirements an applicant must prove to the satisfaction of the Commission pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-262(e). The only one of the three at issue here is the following:(1) That public convenience and necessity require the proposed service…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. EddlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Industrial Group for Fair Utility RatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Gas ServiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998