Legal Opinion

State v. Mick

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2017No. E-16-074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Mick,

2017-Ohio-8922.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. E-16-074 Appellee Trial Court No. 2014-CR-0196 v. Richard C. Mick Defendant DECISION AND JUDGMENT [K. Ronald Bailey—Appellant] Decided: December 8, 2017 ***** Kevin J. Baxter, Erie County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark P. Smith, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Kenneth R. Bailey and Dean C. Henry, for appellant. ***** SINGER, J. Introduction {¶ 1} This appeal arises from the criminal trial of Richard C. Mick, after which retained counsel,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Dayton v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey and Bailey (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. MickOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. In re Contempt of ChristmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API