Legal Opinion

Nicklasch v. JLG Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided December 6, 1999No. IP98-1090-C-D-/FPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FOSTER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Compelling production of statement of Pat Campbell.

The plaintiffs were ordered to submit a statement by Pat Campbell for in camera review by the Court in order to determine its discoverability against the plaintiffs’ assertion of work product protection. Entry of November 23, 1999 (doc. no. 99). The statement was taken by plaintiff Bernd Nicklasch’s employer’s worker’s compensation carrier from Bernd Nicklasch’s work supervisor the day after the accident. The plaintiffs contend that the statement was taken by the carrier for two purposes: first, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leo Logan v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Earl W. Rickman, Jr. v. Deere & Company John Deere Company John Deere LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re: Coeymans’ Marine Towing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
  2. Shaw v. Acadia Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API